Terence Atmane vs Tung Lin Wu — Granby CH Quarter-final

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Terence Atmane
FRA2
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Atmane T.
6-1 6-0
Wu T.
Atmane T.
662
Wu T.
100

Terence Atmane defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-1 6-0 in the Granby CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Wu T.
36
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Clear edge
25
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Wu T.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.6+298 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Hard Elo 1376
8.9Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.9
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Wu T.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
88

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Atmane T.[2]
6-36-776-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[5]
6-26-1
Atmane T.[2]
Uchiyama Y.[7]
6-33-66-4
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
5-76-47-64
Grenier H.[5]
Andrade A.
7-637-5
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-2
Atmane T.[2]
Wu T.
6-16-0
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Bonzi B.[3]
7-687-65
Wu T.
Boyer T.[8]
6-46-756-2
Uchiyama Y.[7]
Habib H.
6-23-66-3
Andrade A.
Boulais J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[5]
Ficovich J.
7-56-3
Kuzuhara B.
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-46-0
Atmane T.[2]
Mejia N.
6-37-5
R32
Andrade A.
Walton A.[1]
4-65-2
Habib H.
Baadi T.
3-66-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Gea A.
6-16-4
Boulais J.
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Bicknell B.
6-16-3
Grenier H.[5]
Chidekh C.
6-37-69
Kuzuhara B.
Galarneau A.[4]
5-77-56-1
Noguchi R.
Lajal M.
3-67-56-3
Sekulic P.
Uchida K.
6-36-726-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-667-5
Uchiyama Y.[7]
Draxl L.
4-67-56-4
Bonzi B.[3]
Holt B.
6-37-64
Boyer T.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-14-67-5
Wu T.
Harper C.
7-57-62
Mejia N.
Kozlov S.
6-16-2
Atmane T.[2]
Maloney P.
6-36-4