Ann Li vs Erika Andreeva — Palermo Round of 16

Palermo · WTA · Round of 16
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1743Clay ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
RUS
Erika Andreeva
#231WTA
1553ELO
1503Clay ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLWW
Li A.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Andreeva E.
Li A.
6462
Andreeva E.
3641

Ann Li defeated Erika Andreeva 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Palermo round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31.

Key context

  • Match story: Ann Li closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Andreeva E.

Andreeva E.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Li A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Li A.Andreeva E.
19
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Andreeva E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 129). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Andreeva E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
65
Break points saved·Dominant
83
56
Break points won·Even
87
86
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Andreeva E.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.6+240 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Clay Elo 1503
8.6Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1553
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
4.9
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Andreeva E.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
85

Li A.: 15 days rest · Andreeva E.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1