Alexander Ritschard vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI8
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1557Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ritschard A.
6-2 6-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Ritschard A.
662
Zapata Miralles B.
240

Alexander Ritschard defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-2 6-4 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alexander Ritschard came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
74
Break points won·Dominant
14
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Zapata Miralles B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.8+150 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1407
6.4Overall Elo 1528
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[8]
Jacquet K.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Buse I.
5-76-27-62
Jacquet K.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Coria F.[1]
6-44-66-1
Buse I.
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-756-36-4
Monteiro T.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Neumayer L.
2-66-46-3
R16
Neumayer L.
Tirante T.[6]
6-46-3
Jacquet K.
Kopp S.
6-15-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-36-3
Buse I.
Kopriva V.[4]
4-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Kasnikowski M.
6-746-26-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Kym J.
6-06-4
Medjedovic H.[5]
Huesler M.
6-37-64
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.[7]
7-56-4
R32
Medjedovic H.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-14-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-4
Kym J.
Nikles J.
6-45-76-1
Monteiro T.[3]
Rola B.
7-626-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Kodat T.
6-47-63
Coria F.[1]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-36-4
Kasnikowski M.
Misolic F.
6-46-2
Buse I.
Campana Lee G.
6-46-2
Huesler M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[7]
Oberleitner N.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.
Tabur C.
6-756-46-4
Skatov T.
Pichler D.
7-636-1
Tirante T.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-626-1
Neumayer L.
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kopp S.
Oetzbach A.
6-726-16-1
Jacquet K.
Daniel T.[2]
6-17-63