Jerome Kym vs Johan Nikles — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Kym J.
6-4 5-7 6-1
Nikles J.
Kym J.
6562
Nikles J.
4711

Jerome Kym defeated Johan Nikles 6-4 5-7 6-1 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jerome Kym came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
75%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
44%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
7
Break points saved·Dominant
91
22
Break points won·Slight edge
21
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
29
Tiebreaks·
80
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Nikles J.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 49 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
8.4+223 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Clay Elo 1306
8.9Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1319
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Nikles J.
Freshness·
69
—

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[8]
Jacquet K.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Buse I.
5-76-27-62
Jacquet K.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Coria F.[1]
6-44-66-1
Buse I.
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-756-36-4
Monteiro T.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Neumayer L.
2-66-46-3
R16
Neumayer L.
Tirante T.[6]
6-46-3
Jacquet K.
Kopp S.
6-15-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-36-3
Buse I.
Kopriva V.[4]
4-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Kasnikowski M.
6-746-26-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Kym J.
6-06-4
Medjedovic H.[5]
Huesler M.
6-37-64
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.[7]
7-56-4
R32
Medjedovic H.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-14-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-4
Kym J.
Nikles J.
6-45-76-1
Monteiro T.[3]
Rola B.
7-626-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Kodat T.
6-47-63
Coria F.[1]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-36-4
Kasnikowski M.
Misolic F.
6-46-2
Buse I.
Campana Lee G.
6-46-2
Huesler M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[7]
Oberleitner N.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.
Tabur C.
6-756-46-4
Skatov T.
Pichler D.
7-636-1
Tirante T.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-626-1
Neumayer L.
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kopp S.
Oetzbach A.
6-726-16-1
Jacquet K.
Daniel T.[2]
6-17-63