Hamad Medjedovic vs Zdenek Kolar — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB5
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Medjedovic H.
6-1 4-1
Kolar Z.
Medjedovic H.
64–
Kolar Z.
11–

Hamad Medjedovic advanced when Zdenek Kolar retired 6-1 4-1 in the Salzburg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
26
Break points saved·Dominant
97
53
Break points won·Slight edge
39
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kolar Z.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+332 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1485
8.9Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1506
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
90

Medjedovic H.: 15 days rest · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[8]
Jacquet K.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Buse I.
5-76-27-62
Jacquet K.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Coria F.[1]
6-44-66-1
Buse I.
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-756-36-4
Monteiro T.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Neumayer L.
2-66-46-3
R16
Neumayer L.
Tirante T.[6]
6-46-3
Jacquet K.
Kopp S.
6-15-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-36-3
Buse I.
Kopriva V.[4]
4-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Kasnikowski M.
6-746-26-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Kym J.
6-06-4
Medjedovic H.[5]
Huesler M.
6-37-64
Moro Canas A.
Choinski J.[7]
7-56-4
R32
Medjedovic H.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-14-1
Ritschard A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-4
Kym J.
Nikles J.
6-45-76-1
Monteiro T.[3]
Rola B.
7-626-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Kodat T.
6-47-63
Coria F.[1]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-36-4
Kasnikowski M.
Misolic F.
6-46-2
Buse I.
Campana Lee G.
6-46-2
Huesler M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[7]
Oberleitner N.
7-56-3
Moro Canas A.
Tabur C.
6-756-46-4
Skatov T.
Pichler D.
7-636-1
Tirante T.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-626-1
Neumayer L.
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kopp S.
Oetzbach A.
6-726-16-1
Jacquet K.
Daniel T.[2]
6-17-63