Enzo Couacaud vs Nerman Fatic — Iasi CH Round of 32

Iasi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA8
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Couacaud E.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Fatic N.
Couacaud E.
4662
Fatic N.
6341

Enzo Couacaud defeated Nerman Fatic 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Iasi CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Enzo Couacaud came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
63
Break points won·Slight edge
29
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
24
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Fatic N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
4.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[6]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[6]
Vallejo A.
7-646-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Couacaud E.[8]
7-657-5
Quarter-finals
Vallejo A.
Landaluce M.
6-26-1
Dellien H.[6]
Royer V.
6-46-756-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Ficovich J.
7-616-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Popko D.
6-746-27-610
R16
Landaluce M.
Boitan G.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.
Bobrov B.
4-66-16-2
Dellien H.[6]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Royer V.
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
7-636-2
Vallejo A.
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Svrcina D.
6-05-76-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Cretu C.
7-56-3
R32
Bobrov B.
Jianu F.
7-615-2
Popko D.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Dellien H.[6]
Strombachs R.
7-54-66-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Ionel N.
6-16-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Vesely J.
7-56-3
Ficovich J.
Ramos A.[2]
7-666-4
Cerundolo J.[3]
Snitari I.
6-46-3
Cretu C.
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-46-3
Boitan G.
Moreno De Alboran N.[5]
7-653-66-4
Sachko V.
Heide G.[7]
6-776-26-3
Couacaud E.[8]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-4
Landaluce M.
Vrbensky M.
1-66-36-1
Royer V.
Papoe R.
6-16-2
Shelbayh A.
Gima S.
6-07-66
Svrcina D.
Janvier M.
6-33-66-3
Vallejo A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-46-4