Pedro Cachin vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Braunschweig CH Quarter-final

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL6
Daniel Elahi Galan
#297ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Cachin P.
6-4 6-4
Galan D.
Cachin P.
662
Galan D.
440

Pedro Cachin defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-4 6-4 in the Braunschweig CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Elahi Galan came in ranked #297, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Pedro Cachin claimed a first win over Daniel Elahi Galan in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Pedro Cachin edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-20Rio de JaneiroR32clayDaniel Elahi Galan7-6(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Serve advantage — Galan D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
92
Break points won·Even
21
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
46
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cachin P.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Galan D.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
5.3
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Herbert P.
6-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Cachin P.
6-26-756-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Garin C.[8]
4-66-37-5
Herbert P.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Squire H.
7-57-62
Cachin P.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Garin C.[8]
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Hassan B.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Klein L.
6-26-4
Herbert P.
Kuhn N.
6-17-5
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-4
Squire H.
Rehberg M.
6-746-26-4
Galan D.[6]
Varillas J.
7-626-4
Cachin P.
Nagal S.[2]
6-47-5
R32
Kuhn N.
Seyboth Wild T.[3]
6-21-0
Klein L.
Kovalik J.
6-737-636-1
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Molleker R.
6-12-66-3
Kukushkin M.
Rodionov J.
3-67-56-3
Garin C.[8]
Dodig M.
4-66-36-4
Herbert P.
Gentzsch T.
2-66-46-4
Ajdukovic D.
Slump S.
6-47-611
Sanchez Jover C.
Yevseyev D.
6-12-66-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Martineau M.
6-26-4
Hassan B.
Geerts M.
6-16-4
Squire H.
Masur D.
5-77-647-65
Rehberg M.
Altmaier D.[4]
2-67-616-3
Galan D.[6]
Moeller M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Fanselow S.
7-626-3
Cachin P.
Barrere G.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4