Roberto Carballes Baena vs Pierre Hugues Herbert — Braunschweig CH Semi-final

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP1
Roberto Carballes Baena
#163ATP
1632ELO
1612Clay ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
clay
Pierre Hugues Herbert
FRA
Pierre Hugues Herbert
#251ATP
1607ELO
1530Clay ELO
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Carballes Baena R.
6-4 6-1
Herbert P.
Carballes Baena R.
662
Herbert P.
410

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Pierre Hugues Herbert 6-4 6-1 in the Braunschweig CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Herbert P.

Herbert P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Herbert P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
8.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (135 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Herbert P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
55
Break points saved·Even
93
96
Break points won·Dominant
58
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
83
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
51
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carballes Baena R.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Herbert P.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.2+82 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1530
5.4Overall Elo 1632
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
1.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
6.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Herbert P.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Carballes Baena R.: 17 days rest · Herbert P.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Herbert P.
6-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Cachin P.
6-26-756-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Garin C.[8]
4-66-37-5
Herbert P.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Squire H.
7-57-62
Cachin P.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Garin C.[8]
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Hassan B.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Klein L.
6-26-4
Herbert P.
Kuhn N.
6-17-5
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-4
Squire H.
Rehberg M.
6-746-26-4
Galan D.[6]
Varillas J.
7-626-4
Cachin P.
Nagal S.[2]
6-47-5
R32
Kuhn N.
Seyboth Wild T.[3]
6-21-0
Klein L.
Kovalik J.
6-737-636-1
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Molleker R.
6-12-66-3
Kukushkin M.
Rodionov J.
3-67-56-3
Garin C.[8]
Dodig M.
4-66-36-4
Herbert P.
Gentzsch T.
2-66-46-4
Ajdukovic D.
Slump S.
6-47-611
Sanchez Jover C.
Yevseyev D.
6-12-66-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Martineau M.
6-26-4
Hassan B.
Geerts M.
6-16-4
Squire H.
Masur D.
5-77-647-65
Rehberg M.
Altmaier D.[4]
2-67-616-3
Galan D.[6]
Moeller M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Fanselow S.
7-626-3
Cachin P.
Barrere G.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4