Brandon Holt vs Terence Atmane — Winnipeg CH Round of 16

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2024
hard
Terence Atmane
FRA2
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Holt B.
7-5 6-2
Atmane T.
Holt B.
762
Atmane T.
520

Brandon Holt defeated Terence Atmane 7-5 6-2 in the Winnipeg CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50. Brandon Holt extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Los CabosQ1hardBrandon Holt6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Atmane T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Holt B.Atmane T.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Atmane T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Atmane T.
Clutch Rating·Even
58
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
95
Break points won·Slight edge
31
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Atmane T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
7.3+166 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1704
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Atmane T.
Freshness·
—
96

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
5-76-16-4
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.[3]
Yunchaokete B.
3-67-666-0
Shimabukuro S.
Spizzirri E.
6-31-66-4
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[3]
Shimizu Y.
6-17-60
Shimabukuro S.
Schoolkate T.[6]
6-26-4
Spizzirri E.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.
Holt B.
6-746-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.
Polmans M.
3-66-26-3
Spizzirri E.
Wolf J.[1]
7-616-3
Holt B.
Atmane T.[2]
7-56-2
Bonzi B.[3]
Sekulic P.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[6]
Bellier A.
4-66-36-3
Grenier H.[7]
Draxl L.
6-23-67-5
Shimabukuro S.
Mejia N.
6-26-1
R32
Holt B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Atmane T.[2]
Martin A.
7-56-776-1
Schoolkate T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-27-65
Grenier H.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Wolf J.[1]
Gea A.
6-26-4
Bonzi B.[3]
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-2
Shimizu Y.
Hong S.[8]
6-27-5
Bellier A.
Boyer T.
7-657-5
Yunchaokete B.
Pospisil V.
3-67-626-2
Draxl L.
Brouwer G.
7-57-5
Habib H.
Basavareddy N.
5-76-16-4
Mejia N.
Mayo A.
6-26-4
Sekulic P.
Lajal M.
7-54-66-3
Shimabukuro S.
Marchenko I.
7-56-1
Spizzirri E.
Rice K.
6-37-5