Roberto Bautista Agut vs Fabio FogniniWimbledon Round of 32

Wimbledon · ATP · Round of 32
#183ATP
1700ELO
1662Grass ELO
$442kYTD
$20MCAREER
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLL
3 — 2
Sets
Saturday, 6 July 2024 ·
grass
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Bautista Agut R.
7-6 3-6 5-7 7-6 6-4
Fognini F.
Bautista Agut R.
78357763
Fognini F.
66676142

Roberto Bautista Agut defeated Fabio Fognini 7-6 3-6 5-7 7-6 6-4 in the Wimbledon round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Fabio Fognini came in leading the head-to-head 7–4, but Roberto Bautista Agut had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on grass. Roberto Bautista Agut narrowed the head-to-head to 7–5.

Key context

Head to head

47
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonR32grassRoberto Bautista Agut7-6 3-6 5-7 7-6 6-4
2019-05-27Roland GarrosR32clayFabio Fognini7-6 6-4 4-6 6-1
2019-03-18Miami MastersR32hardRoberto Bautista Agut6-4 6-4
2017-09-18St. PetersburgSFcarpetFabio Fognini2-6 7-6 7-6
2017-07-24GstaadSFclayFabio Fognini5-7 6-2 6-3
2014-07-07StuttgartSFgrassRoberto Bautista Agut6-3 6-4
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersR32clayFabio Fognini7-6 6-4
2014-03-19Miami MastersR32hardFabio Fognini4-6 6-3 6-3
2013-07-08StuttgartSFgrassFabio Fognini6-1 6-3
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardRoberto Bautista Agut6-0 2-6 6-4 3-6 6-1
2012-09-17St. PetersburgQFcarpetFabio Fognini6-4 7-6

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
80
81
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
77
Break points won·Clear edge
71
89
Deciding sets·Even
91
91
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
85
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw