Bernard Tomic vs Quinn Vandecasteele — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 16

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
USA
Quinn Vandecasteele
#461ATP
1383ELO
1368Hard ELO
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Tomic B.
1-6 7-6 6-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Tomic B.
17762
Vandecasteele Q.
66331

Bernard Tomic defeated Quinn Vandecasteele 1-6 7-6 6-3 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Vandecasteele Q.

Vandecasteele Q.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Vandecasteele Q.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Vandecasteele Q.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.2+73 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1368
6.4Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1383
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Vandecasteele Q.
Freshness·Clear edge
84
66

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Vandecasteele Q.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 91 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2