Zsombor Piros vs Clement Tabur — Karlsruhe CH Round of 16

Karlsruhe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN7
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWLWW
Piros Z.
5-7 6-4 6-3
Tabur C.
Piros Z.
5662
Tabur C.
7431

Zsombor Piros defeated Clement Tabur 5-7 6-4 6-3 in the Karlsruhe CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #169, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
74
Break points won·Slight edge
32
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
33
Tiebreaks·Even
36
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+67 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1553
6.3Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1607
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
53
87

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 112 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Piros Z.[7]
6-46-0
Kovalik J.[2]
Masur D.
6-736-06-1
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Hassan B.[4]
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Butvilas E.
6-46-1
Piros Z.[7]
Andreev A.
3-66-36-3
Kovalik J.[2]
Molleker R.
7-666-2
R16
Piros Z.[7]
Tabur C.
5-76-46-3
Andreev A.
Engel J.
4-66-46-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Zakharov A.
6-47-5
Butvilas E.
Vrbensky M.
5-76-16-3
Masur D.
Shelbayh A.
7-666-3
Hassan B.[4]
Strombachs R.
6-36-4
Molleker R.
Furness E.
6-46-2
Kovalik J.[2]
Gavrielides L.
5-76-36-4
R32
Tabur C.
Kodat T.
6-26-3
Zakharov A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-647-66
Furness E.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-36-2
Andreev A.
Kym J.
6-36-747-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Kolar Z.
3-66-36-1
Vrbensky M.
Kuhn N.
6-13-66-4
Butvilas E.
Dellien H.[6]
5-76-37-63
Engel J.
Herbert P.[3]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[7]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-656-4
Shelbayh A.
Yevseyev D.[5]
6-26-3
Masur D.
Kachmazov A.
3-66-47-5
Strombachs R.
Rincon D.
6-36-4
Hassan B.[4]
Rehberg M.
6-16-4
Molleker R.
De Loore J.[8]
7-651-66-3
Gavrielides L.
Oliveira G.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[2]
Schell N.
6-16-2