Bernard Tomic vs Nicolas Mejia — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
Nicolas Mejia
COL
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1424Hard ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Tomic B.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Mejia N.
Tomic B.
61662
Mejia N.
77341

Bernard Tomic defeated Nicolas Mejia 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #133, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Bernard Tomic claimed a first win over Nicolas Mejia in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-23AcapulcoQ1hardNicolas Mejia6-3 3-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Even
4
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Mejia N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+18 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1424
4.7Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1477
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.8
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Mejia N.
Freshness·Dominant
84
55

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Mejia N.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2