Martin Landaluce vs Carlos Taberner — Troyes CH Round of 32

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Landaluce
ESP8
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Landaluce M.
6-4 2-6 6-2
Taberner C.
Landaluce M.
6262
Taberner C.
4621

Martin Landaluce defeated Carlos Taberner 6-4 2-6 6-2 in the Troyes CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Dominant
17
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5+50 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.5Clay Elo 1605
6.1Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Taberner C.
Freshness·
100
—

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Debru G.
Skatov T.[3]
6-36-717-5
Semi-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-4
Debru G.
Marmousez L.
2-66-26-1
Quarter-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Giustino L.
Karlovskiy E.
6-06-747-5
Marmousez L.
Oberleitner N.
2-66-47-65
Debru G.
Landaluce M.[8]
5-76-27-65
R16
Giustino L.
Sultanov K.
6-26-2
Karlovskiy E.
Naw H.
6-16-3
Skatov T.[3]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Pieczkowski O.
7-656-2
Oberleitner N.
Gaubas V.
6-46-2
Marmousez L.
Alvarez Varona N.
1-66-26-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Debru G.
Fanselow S.
6-26-3
R32
Debru G.
Hemery C.[2]
7-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.
Guillen Meza A.[4]
4-66-26-3
Gaubas V.
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-26-3
Sultanov K.
Trungelliti M.[1]
3-67-646-2
Giustino L.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-26-1
Karlovskiy E.
Beauge M.
7-56-4
Naw H.
Moller E.[7]
6-47-64
Skatov T.[3]
Brunold M.
6-16-756-3
Erhard M.
Rivet M.
3-66-26-2
Pieczkowski O.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Lamasine T.[6]
7-656-3
Oberleitner N.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-3
Marmousez L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Landaluce M.[8]
Taberner C.
6-42-66-2
Geerts M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-3
Fanselow S.
Ursu V.
6-16-3