Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Brandon Holt — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Kwiatkowski T.
6-3 6-4
Holt B.
Kwiatkowski T.
662
Holt B.
340

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
85
Break points won·Dominant
6
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
1
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Holt B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
7.4
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2