Michael Geerts vs David Jorda Sanchis — Troyes CH Round of 32

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
David Jorda Sanchis
ESP
David Jorda Sanchis
#189ATP
1545ELO
1551Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$240kCAREER
32 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Geerts M.
6-4 6-3
Jorda Sanchis D.
Geerts M.
662
Jorda Sanchis D.
430

Michael Geerts defeated David Jorda Sanchis 6-4 6-3 in the Troyes CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — David Jorda Sanchis came in ranked #189, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jorda Sanchis D.

Jorda Sanchis D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Jorda Sanchis D.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 135). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Jorda Sanchis D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
38
Break points saved·Even
82
79
Break points won·Clear edge
3
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
69
Tiebreaks·Even
2
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jorda Sanchis D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1348
Surface ELO
5.2+203 Clay Elo edge
5.8Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1545
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.1
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Jorda Sanchis D.
Freshness·Even
89
85

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Jorda Sanchis D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Debru G.
Skatov T.[3]
6-36-717-5
Semi-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-4
Debru G.
Marmousez L.
2-66-26-1
Quarter-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Giustino L.
Karlovskiy E.
6-06-747-5
Marmousez L.
Oberleitner N.
2-66-47-65
Debru G.
Landaluce M.[8]
5-76-27-65
R16
Giustino L.
Sultanov K.
6-26-2
Karlovskiy E.
Naw H.
6-16-3
Skatov T.[3]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Pieczkowski O.
7-656-2
Oberleitner N.
Gaubas V.
6-46-2
Marmousez L.
Alvarez Varona N.
1-66-26-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Debru G.
Fanselow S.
6-26-3
R32
Debru G.
Hemery C.[2]
7-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.
Guillen Meza A.[4]
4-66-26-3
Gaubas V.
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-26-3
Sultanov K.
Trungelliti M.[1]
3-67-646-2
Giustino L.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-26-1
Karlovskiy E.
Beauge M.
7-56-4
Naw H.
Moller E.[7]
6-47-64
Skatov T.[3]
Brunold M.
6-16-756-3
Erhard M.
Rivet M.
3-66-26-2
Pieczkowski O.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Lamasine T.[6]
7-656-3
Oberleitner N.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-3
Marmousez L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Landaluce M.[8]
Taberner C.
6-42-66-2
Geerts M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-3
Fanselow S.
Ursu V.
6-16-3