Martin Landaluce vs Michael Geerts — Troyes CH Round of 16

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Landaluce
ESP8
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Landaluce M.
7-6 6-1
Geerts M.
Landaluce M.
7762
Geerts M.
6410

Martin Landaluce defeated Michael Geerts 7-6 6-1 in the Troyes CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Landaluce came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.7+306 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1348
8.6Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1400
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.3
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Geerts M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest · Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Debru G.
Skatov T.[3]
6-36-717-5
Semi-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Giustino L.
7-656-4
Debru G.
Marmousez L.
2-66-26-1
Quarter-finals
Skatov T.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Giustino L.
Karlovskiy E.
6-06-747-5
Marmousez L.
Oberleitner N.
2-66-47-65
Debru G.
Landaluce M.[8]
5-76-27-65
R16
Giustino L.
Sultanov K.
6-26-2
Karlovskiy E.
Naw H.
6-16-3
Skatov T.[3]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Pieczkowski O.
7-656-2
Oberleitner N.
Gaubas V.
6-46-2
Marmousez L.
Alvarez Varona N.
1-66-26-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-646-1
Debru G.
Fanselow S.
6-26-3
R32
Debru G.
Hemery C.[2]
7-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.
Guillen Meza A.[4]
4-66-26-3
Gaubas V.
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-26-3
Sultanov K.
Trungelliti M.[1]
3-67-646-2
Giustino L.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-26-1
Karlovskiy E.
Beauge M.
7-56-4
Naw H.
Moller E.[7]
6-47-64
Skatov T.[3]
Brunold M.
6-16-756-3
Erhard M.
Rivet M.
3-66-26-2
Pieczkowski O.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Lamasine T.[6]
7-656-3
Oberleitner N.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-3
Marmousez L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Landaluce M.[8]
Taberner C.
6-42-66-2
Geerts M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-3
Fanselow S.
Ursu V.
6-16-3