Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco vs Nerman Fatic — Brasov CH Semi-final

Brasov CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
BOL5
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
BIH6
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Dellien Velasco M.
6-3 6-2
Fatic N.
Dellien Velasco M.
662
Fatic N.
320

Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco defeated Nerman Fatic 6-3 6-2 in the Brasov CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dellien Velasco M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dellien Velasco M.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dellien Velasco M.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
19
24
Break points saved·Dominant
28
63
Break points won·Clear edge
19
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
24
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
28
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dellien Velasco M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Clay Elo 1368
Surface ELO
6.4+110 Clay Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1379
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Popko D.[8]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Popko D.[8]
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-726-26-2
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Fatic N.[6]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Popko D.[8]
Jianu F.
1-67-56-4
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Papoe R.
6-46-4
Fatic N.[6]
Cretu C.
7-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
R16
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Olivieri G.
4-2
Cretu C.
Royer V.
6-47-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-1
Papoe R.
Svrcina D.
7-56-2
Fatic N.[6]
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Popko D.[8]
Palosi S.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Heide G.[3]
6-33-66-2
Dodig M.
Kirkin E.
6-16-3
R32
Kirkin E.
Ficovich J.[7]
2-67-656-3
Royer V.
Krumich M.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Elias G.
7-666-2
Popko D.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Heide G.[3]
Luz O.
7-56-4
Dodig M.
Sels J.
3-67-636-2
Svrcina D.
Burruchaga R.[1]
6-40-66-3
Papoe R.
Orlov V.
6-36-757-5
Olivieri G.
Dancu V.
7-646-1
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Boitan G.
6-36-3
Cretu C.
Mikrut L.
7-54-66-2
Sachko V.
Ionel N.
7-656-4
Fatic N.[6]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Palosi S.
Weis A.
6-746-46-4
Jianu F.
Echargui M.
4-67-56-1
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Chirita I.
6-26-1