Nerman Fatic vs Vitaliy Sachko — Brasov CH Round of 16

Brasov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BIH6
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
clay
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#195ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Fatic N.
6-4 6-4
Sachko V.
Fatic N.
662
Sachko V.
440

Nerman Fatic defeated Vitaliy Sachko 6-4 6-4 in the Brasov CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Vitaliy Sachko came in ranked #195, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Nerman Fatic claimed a first win over Vitaliy Sachko in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-11-06SofiaQ2hardVitaliy Sachko6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Sachko V.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Sachko V.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 141). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Sachko V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
81
Break points won·Clear edge
36
48
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sachko V.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
5.3+72 Clay Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1584
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
4.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Sachko V.
Freshness·
—
83

Sachko V.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Popko D.[8]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Popko D.[8]
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-726-26-2
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Fatic N.[6]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Popko D.[8]
Jianu F.
1-67-56-4
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Papoe R.
6-46-4
Fatic N.[6]
Cretu C.
7-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
R16
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Olivieri G.
4-2
Cretu C.
Royer V.
6-47-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-1
Papoe R.
Svrcina D.
7-56-2
Fatic N.[6]
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Popko D.[8]
Palosi S.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Heide G.[3]
6-33-66-2
Dodig M.
Kirkin E.
6-16-3
R32
Kirkin E.
Ficovich J.[7]
2-67-656-3
Royer V.
Krumich M.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Elias G.
7-666-2
Popko D.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Heide G.[3]
Luz O.
7-56-4
Dodig M.
Sels J.
3-67-636-2
Svrcina D.
Burruchaga R.[1]
6-40-66-3
Papoe R.
Orlov V.
6-36-757-5
Olivieri G.
Dancu V.
7-646-1
Dellien Velasco M.[5]
Boitan G.
6-36-3
Cretu C.
Mikrut L.
7-54-66-2
Sachko V.
Ionel N.
7-656-4
Fatic N.[6]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Palosi S.
Weis A.
6-746-46-4
Jianu F.
Echargui M.
4-67-56-1
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Chirita I.
6-26-1