Ryan Seggerman vs Gijs Brouwer — Bloomfield Hills CH Quarter-final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Ryan Seggerman
#649ATP
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
Gijs Brouwer
NED4
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Seggerman R.
6-4 6-4
Brouwer G.
Seggerman R.
662
Brouwer G.
440

Ryan Seggerman defeated Gijs Brouwer 6-4 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Seggerman edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seggerman R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Brouwer G.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Seggerman R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seggerman R.Brouwer G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seggerman R.Brouwer G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
92
Break points won·Slight edge
0
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
25
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seggerman R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Brouwer G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seggerman R.Brouwer G.
Freshness·Even
93
92

Seggerman R.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2