Gijs Brouwer vs Christian Langmo — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gijs Brouwer
NED4
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Brouwer G.
6-1 6-4
Langmo C.
Brouwer G.
662
Langmo C.
140

Gijs Brouwer defeated Christian Langmo 6-1 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
7.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
23
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Slight edge
6
1
Deciding sets·Even
22
26
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Langmo C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
7.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Langmo C.
Freshness·Dominant
92
65

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2