Yuta Shimizu vs Micah Braswell — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Yuta Shimizu
#371ATP
1446ELO
1417Hard ELO
27 yrs · 163 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
USA
Micah Braswell
#969ATP
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Shimizu Y.
1-6 7-6 6-1
Braswell M.
Shimizu Y.
17762
Braswell M.
66411

Yuta Shimizu defeated Micah Braswell 1-6 7-6 6-1 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yuta Shimizu came in ranked #371, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shimizu Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Braswell M.

Braswell M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shimizu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shimizu Y.Braswell M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shimizu Y.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Braswell M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shimizu Y.Braswell M.
Freshness·
75
—

Shimizu Y.: played today · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2