Tung Lin Wu vs Tristan Boyer — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2024
hard
Tristan Boyer
USA7
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1525Hard ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Wu T.
6-2 7-6
Boyer T.
Wu T.
6772
Boyer T.
2630

Tung Lin Wu defeated Tristan Boyer 6-2 7-6 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Boyer T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Boyer T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 145). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Boyer T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
43
Break points saved·Even
84
83
Break points won·Clear edge
6
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
81
Tiebreaks·Even
4
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Boyer T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
6.1+149 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1561
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
7.1
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Boyer T.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
100

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Boyer T.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
6-22-0
Tien L.
Seggerman R.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Tomic B.
6-40-0
Tien L.
Sekulic P.
4-67-646-3
Seggerman R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.[1]
6-46-4
R16
Kozlov S.
Wu T.
5-76-34-0
Seggerman R.
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Wolf J.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-4
Tomic B.
Vandecasteele Q.
1-67-636-3
Basavareddy N.
Bellier A.
6-34-66-2
Brouwer G.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-766-26-3
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
0-67-56-0
Sekulic P.
Quinn E.
3-67-57-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Nava E.[2]
6-02-67-5
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
6-716-36-4
Wu T.
Boyer T.[7]
6-27-63
Tien L.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-3
Wolf J.[1]
Martin A.
6-47-5
Shimizu Y.
Braswell M.
1-67-646-1
Kozlov S.
Zheng M.
4-67-56-1
Vandecasteele Q.
Schoolkate T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Moriya H.
2-66-26-1
Basavareddy N.
Polmans M.[8]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[5]
6-33-66-3
Seggerman R.
Uchida K.
7-636-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Holt B.
6-36-4
Brouwer G.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Baris O.
6-26-2