Chun Hsin Tseng vs Carlos Taberner — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE3
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Tseng C.
7-5 3-6 6-4
Taberner C.
Tseng C.
7362
Taberner C.
5641

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Carlos Taberner 7-5 3-6 6-4 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (171 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
74
Break points won·Dominant
15
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
75
Tiebreaks·Even
23
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1541
Surface ELO
6.0+64 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1610
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.6
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
4.6
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Taberner C.
Freshness·
100
—

Tseng C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez F.
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Jianu F.
Dalla Valle E.[5]
6-30-67-5
Gomez F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Jianu F.
Moller E.
2-66-20-0
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Gakhov I.
7-656-4
Gomez F.
Gaubas V.
6-16-4
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Tseng C.[3]
6-06-4
R16
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-5
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Ramos A.[1]
6-26-4
Gakhov I.
Gaio F.
7-656-3
Gaubas V.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-66-36-4
Gomez F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
4-66-46-1
Tseng C.[3]
Mager G.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Cecchinato M.
6-17-5
Moller E.
Varillas J.[2]
6-36-1
R32
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
7-647-63
Varillas J.[2]
Debru G.
6-44-66-3
Gomez F.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Ramos A.[1]
Bueno G.
4-66-07-63
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Vrbensky M.
6-736-46-1
Gaio F.
Gerasimov E.
6-31-66-3
Gakhov I.
Onclin G.[7]
6-26-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Kasnikowski M.[4]
6-47-65
Gaubas V.
Demin Y.
6-16-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
Picchione A.
6-31-66-1
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Buse I.
6-41-66-2
Fonio G.
Bourgue M.
6-23-67-68
Mager G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-13-66-3
Tseng C.[3]
Taberner C.
7-53-66-4
Jianu F.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
6-37-67
Cecchinato M.
Cina F.
6-27-64