Juncheng Shang vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Eastbourne Round of 16

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 16
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1651Grass ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
grass
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#786ATP
1606ELO
1576Grass ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Shang J.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Shang J.
4662
Ruusuvuori E.
6341

Juncheng Shang defeated Emil Ruusuvuori 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Eastbourne round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Even
76
72
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Even
45
48
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
80
Tiebreaks·Even
86
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ruusuvuori E.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+74 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Grass Elo 1576
6.7Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1606
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.[1]
Purcell M.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[1]
Vukic A.
7-657-64
Purcell M.
Harris B.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[1]
Shang J.
7-657-65
Purcell M.
Kecmanovic M.
6-37-64
Harris B.
Cobolli F.
6-737-646-2
Vukic A.
Nishioka Y.
6-33-67-65
R16
Purcell M.
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Shang J.
Ruusuvuori E.
4-66-36-4
Kecmanovic M.
Baez S.[4]
6-36-2
Fritz T.[1]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-646-3
Vukic A.
Bublik A.[3]
6-46-4
Cobolli F.
Hussey G.
4-66-36-4
Harris B.
Broom C.
3-66-26-2
Nishioka Y.
Giron M.
6-786-46-2
R32
Hussey G.
Navone M.[6]
6-46-2
Harris B.
Fearnley J.
6-47-67
Cobolli F.
Rinderknech A.
6-47-5
Kecmanovic M.
Zhang Z.
6-27-62
Giron M.
Cerundolo F.[5]
7-657-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Djere L.
6-14-66-3
Shang J.
Etcheverry T.[7]
7-53-67-64
Ruusuvuori E.
Norrie C.
7-696-3
Nishioka Y.
Broady L.
6-36-4
Vukic A.
Marozsan F.
6-26-4
Sonego L.
Searle H.
6-36-2