Federico Agustin Gomez vs Vilius Gaubas — Milan CH Quarter-final

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
clay
LTU
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1535Clay ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
Gomez F.
6-1 6-4
Gaubas V.
Gomez F.
662
Gaubas V.
140

Federico Agustin Gomez defeated Vilius Gaubas 6-1 6-4 in the Milan CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Vilius Gaubas came in ranked #128, but Federico Agustin Gomez had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Gaubas V.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez F.Gaubas V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez F.Gaubas V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
87
Break points won·Dominant
18
52
Deciding sets·Clear edge
62
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez F.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gaubas V.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Clay Elo 1410
Surface ELO
7.5+125 Clay Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1445
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1581
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez F.Gaubas V.
Freshness·Slight edge
59
70

Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d) · Gaubas V.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez F.
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Jianu F.
Dalla Valle E.[5]
6-30-67-5
Gomez F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Jianu F.
Moller E.
2-66-20-0
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Gakhov I.
7-656-4
Gomez F.
Gaubas V.
6-16-4
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Tseng C.[3]
6-06-4
R16
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-5
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Ramos A.[1]
6-26-4
Gakhov I.
Gaio F.
7-656-3
Gaubas V.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-66-36-4
Gomez F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
4-66-46-1
Tseng C.[3]
Mager G.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Cecchinato M.
6-17-5
Moller E.
Varillas J.[2]
6-36-1
R32
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
7-647-63
Varillas J.[2]
Debru G.
6-44-66-3
Gomez F.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Ramos A.[1]
Bueno G.
4-66-07-63
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Vrbensky M.
6-736-46-1
Gaio F.
Gerasimov E.
6-31-66-3
Gakhov I.
Onclin G.[7]
6-26-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Kasnikowski M.[4]
6-47-65
Gaubas V.
Demin Y.
6-16-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
Picchione A.
6-31-66-1
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Buse I.
6-41-66-2
Fonio G.
Bourgue M.
6-23-67-68
Mager G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-13-66-3
Tseng C.[3]
Taberner C.
7-53-66-4
Jianu F.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
6-37-67
Cecchinato M.
Cina F.
6-27-64