Ivan Gakhov vs Gauthier Onclin — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
clay
Gauthier Onclin
BEL7
Gauthier Onclin
#169ATP
1567ELO
1496Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$616kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWL
Gakhov I.
6-2 6-2
Onclin G.
Gakhov I.
662
Onclin G.
220

Ivan Gakhov defeated Gauthier Onclin 6-2 6-2 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gauthier Onclin came in ranked #169, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Onclin G.

Onclin G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Onclin G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Onclin G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
46
Break points saved·Even
82
79
Break points won·Slight edge
9
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Onclin G.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
6.8+112 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1567
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.6
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Onclin G.
Freshness·
—
80

Onclin G.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez F.
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Jianu F.
Dalla Valle E.[5]
6-30-67-5
Gomez F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Jianu F.
Moller E.
2-66-20-0
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Gakhov I.
7-656-4
Gomez F.
Gaubas V.
6-16-4
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Tseng C.[3]
6-06-4
R16
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-5
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Ramos A.[1]
6-26-4
Gakhov I.
Gaio F.
7-656-3
Gaubas V.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-66-36-4
Gomez F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
4-66-46-1
Tseng C.[3]
Mager G.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Cecchinato M.
6-17-5
Moller E.
Varillas J.[2]
6-36-1
R32
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
7-647-63
Varillas J.[2]
Debru G.
6-44-66-3
Gomez F.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Ramos A.[1]
Bueno G.
4-66-07-63
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Vrbensky M.
6-736-46-1
Gaio F.
Gerasimov E.
6-31-66-3
Gakhov I.
Onclin G.[7]
6-26-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Kasnikowski M.[4]
6-47-65
Gaubas V.
Demin Y.
6-16-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
Picchione A.
6-31-66-1
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Buse I.
6-41-66-2
Fonio G.
Bourgue M.
6-23-67-68
Mager G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-13-66-3
Tseng C.[3]
Taberner C.
7-53-66-4
Jianu F.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
6-37-67
Cecchinato M.
Cina F.
6-27-64