Federico Gaio vs Egor Gerasimov — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
clay
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Gaio F.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Gerasimov E.
Gaio F.
6162
Gerasimov E.
3631

Federico Gaio defeated Egor Gerasimov 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Gaio closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Serve advantage — Gerasimov E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaio F.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
20
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
88
Break points won·Slight edge
3
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaio F.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerasimov E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.3
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez F.
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Jianu F.
Dalla Valle E.[5]
6-30-67-5
Gomez F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Jianu F.
Moller E.
2-66-20-0
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Gakhov I.
7-656-4
Gomez F.
Gaubas V.
6-16-4
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Tseng C.[3]
6-06-4
R16
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-5
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Ramos A.[1]
6-26-4
Gakhov I.
Gaio F.
7-656-3
Gaubas V.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-66-36-4
Gomez F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
4-66-46-1
Tseng C.[3]
Mager G.
7-57-5
Jianu F.
Cecchinato M.
6-17-5
Moller E.
Varillas J.[2]
6-36-1
R32
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
7-647-63
Varillas J.[2]
Debru G.
6-44-66-3
Gomez F.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Ramos A.[1]
Bueno G.
4-66-07-63
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Vrbensky M.
6-736-46-1
Gaio F.
Gerasimov E.
6-31-66-3
Gakhov I.
Onclin G.[7]
6-26-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Kasnikowski M.[4]
6-47-65
Gaubas V.
Demin Y.
6-16-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
Picchione A.
6-31-66-1
Dalla Valle E.[5]
Buse I.
6-41-66-2
Fonio G.
Bourgue M.
6-23-67-68
Mager G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-13-66-3
Tseng C.[3]
Taberner C.
7-53-66-4
Jianu F.
Barranco Cosano J.[6]
6-37-67
Cecchinato M.
Cina F.
6-27-64