Facundo Mena vs Juan Carlos Prado Angelo — Ibague CH Round of 16

Ibague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Facundo Mena
ARG5
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2024
clay
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
BOL
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
#173ATP
1576ELO
1554Clay ELO
$163kYTD
$320kCAREER
21 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWWWL
Mena F.
6-4 7-6
Prado Angelo J.
Mena F.
6772
Prado Angelo J.
4650

Facundo Mena defeated Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 6-4 7-6 in the Ibague CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Prado Angelo J.

Prado Angelo J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Prado Angelo J.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Prado Angelo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
40
Break points won·Clear edge
7
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Prado Angelo J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1406
Surface ELO
6.6+148 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1576
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.1
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
0.8
Minutes 14d
3.3
4.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Prado Angelo J.
Freshness·Slight edge
66
71

Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · Prado Angelo J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Mena F.[5]
6-06-4
Semi-finals
Mena F.[5]
Soto M.[8]
7-613-66-2
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Mejia N.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Soto M.[8]
Torres J.[9]
6-26-4
Mena F.[5]
Habib H.[3]
6-47-66
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Aboian V.
6-16-3
R16
Habib H.[3]
Cid R.
6-33-2
Mejia N.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Torres J.[9]
Aboian L.
3-66-36-2
Soto M.[8]
Barreiros Reyes M.
7-636-2
Mena F.[5]
Prado Angelo J.
6-47-65
Aboian V.
Olivo R.[6]
7-676-1
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Schachter N.
6-06-2
Farjat T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[7]
4-67-656-2
R32
Aboian L.
Villanueva G.
7-647-64
Aboian V.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Gomez J.
3-66-46-1
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Osorio J.
6-16-0
Prado Angelo J.
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-21-66-2
Torres J.[9]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-10-66-3
Soto M.[8]
Zanellato N.
6-46-4
Habib H.[3]
Stater A.
6-46-1
Cid R.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-47-63
Mena F.[5]
Johns G.
7-616-4
Olivo R.[6]
Nunez D.
6-27-63
Schachter N.
Blanch D.
6-736-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[7]
Heredia S.
6-36-2
Farjat T.
Pereira J.
6-33-66-3
Lingua Lavallen A.
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Mejia N.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-26-1