Jordan Thompson vs Holger Rune — Queen's Club Round of 32

Queen's Club · ATP · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
grass
Holger Rune
DEN7
Holger Rune
#77ATP
1757ELO
1628Grass ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Thompson J.
4-6 7-6 6-3
Rune H.
Thompson J.
47762
Rune H.
66431

Jordan Thompson defeated Holger Rune 4-6 7-6 6-3 in the Queen's Club round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #77, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Rune H.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Rune H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Rune H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
91
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
24
84
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
98
Tiebreaks·Even
95
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rune H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.8+80 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Grass Elo 1628
4.9Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1757
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
19°CMainly clear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Paul T.[5]
Musetti L.
6-17-68
Semi-finals
Paul T.[5]
Korda S.
6-47-62
Musetti L.
Thompson J.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.
Fritz T.[4]
6-46-3
Musetti L.
Harris B.
6-37-5
Paul T.[5]
Draper J.
6-35-76-4
Korda S.
Hijikata R.
6-746-36-4
R16
Thompson J.
Murray A.
4-1
Draper J.
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-636-3
Paul T.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-4
Hijikata R.
Arnaldi M.
7-607-67
Harris B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-5
Korda S.
Dimitrov G.[3]
6-43-67-5
Fritz T.[4]
Raonic M.
7-656-4
Musetti L.
Nakashima B.
6-44-66-4
R32
Draper J.
Navone M.
6-36-2
Paul T.[5]
Baez S.
6-46-4
Dimitrov G.[3]
Mannarino A.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Evans D.
4-66-30-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Shelton B.[6]
6-37-63
Harris B.
Etcheverry T.
6-43-66-3
Thompson J.
Rune H.[7]
4-67-646-3
Hijikata R.
Tiafoe F.
7-54-61-0
Murray A.
Popyrin A.
6-33-66-3
Alcaraz C.[1]
Cerundolo F.
6-17-5
Korda S.
Khachanov K.
7-57-65
Arnaldi M.
Humbert U.[8]
3-66-17-66
Raonic M.
Norrie C.
6-766-37-69
Fritz T.[4]
Daniel T.
6-36-3
Tabilo A.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-663-66-1
Musetti L.
De Minaur A.[2]
1-66-46-2