Harold Mayot vs Emilio Nava — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1500Grass ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
grass
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1560Grass ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Mayot H.
7-5 6-4
Nava E.
Mayot H.
762
Nava E.
540

Harold Mayot defeated Emilio Nava 7-5 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91. Harold Mayot extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-22AtlantaQ1hardHarold Mayot6-3 5-7 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
52
Break points saved·Even
92
94
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
8
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.3Grass Elo 1500
Surface ELO
5.7+61 Grass Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1704
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Nava E.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Mayot H.: 15 days rest · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Goffin D.[4]
Mayot H.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Goffin D.[4]
Svajda Z.[7]
7-56-736-3
Mayot H.
Bonzi B.
2-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mayot H.
Harris L.[2]
6-36-2
Svajda Z.[7]
Klein L.
6-44-66-1
Goffin D.[4]
Atmane T.
6-36-4
Bonzi B.
Droguet T.
7-656-4
R16
Goffin D.[4]
Stricker D.
7-627-62
Mayot H.
Gasquet R.[6]
7-636-2
Harris L.[2]
Fery A.
6-47-65
Klein L.
Barrios Vera T.
2-67-626-4
Svajda Z.[7]
Broom C.
3-66-36-2
Atmane T.
Albot R.
7-646-2
Bonzi B.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-16-4
Droguet T.
Barrere G.[3]
7-626-4
R32
Klein L.
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Mayot H.
Nava E.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.
Kudla D.
7-657-65
Napolitano S.[8]
Wong C.
6-46-4
Albot R.
Zhukayev B.
6-746-27-65
Barrios Vera T.
Gaston H.[1]
7-646-756-3
Broom C.
Kukushkin M.
7-626-1
Svajda Z.[7]
Cressy M.
7-57-63
Goffin D.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-3
Stricker D.
Gill F.
6-36-736-1
Atmane T.
Garin C.[5]
7-644-66-2
Droguet T.
Diallo G.
7-55-76-3
Barrere G.[3]
Rocha H.
6-726-36-2
Gasquet R.[6]
Bellucci M.
4-67-626-4
Fery A.
Ajdukovic D.
6-47-62
Harris L.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-2