Corentin Denolly vs Michael Geerts — Blois CH Round of 16

Blois CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#439ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Denolly C.
6-4 6-2
Geerts M.
Denolly C.
662
Geerts M.
420

Corentin Denolly defeated Michael Geerts 6-4 6-2 in the Blois CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Geerts came in ranked #328, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Denolly C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Serve advantage — Geerts M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Denolly C.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Denolly C.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
82
Break points won·Slight edge
13
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Denolly C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Geerts M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1293
Surface ELO
5.7+55 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1331
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Berankis R.
Hemery C.[1]
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Berankis R.
Marie J.[3]
6-06-4
Hemery C.[1]
Kachmazov A.[5]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.[1]
Denolly C.
7-653-67-63
Kachmazov A.[5]
Kirkin E.[4]
6-26-4
Marie J.[3]
Bax F.
6-736-36-1
Berankis R.
Gea A.
6-46-3
R16
Berankis R.
Iannaccone F.
6-36-0
Marie J.[3]
Bertola R.
7-633-67-65
Hemery C.[1]
Echargui M.
6-26-3
Denolly C.
Geerts M.
6-46-2
Kirkin E.[4]
Butvilas E.
6-46-746-2
Kachmazov A.[5]
Bouquet L.
6-27-5
Bax F.
Debru G.
7-647-5
Gea A.
Landaluce M.
2-66-37-63
R32
Butvilas E.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-797-692-0
Debru G.
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Ursu V.
6-36-1
Hemery C.[1]
Berrettini J.
6-36-3
Denolly C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Gaubas V.
7-626-3
Kirkin E.[4]
Taberner C.
6-746-46-2
Bouquet L.
Krumich M.
7-694-67-66
Kachmazov A.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-37-66
Bax F.
Lamasine T.[7]
6-26-4
Bertola R.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-1
Marie J.[3]
Lock B.
6-34-67-5
Iannaccone F.
Moller E.[8]
6-757-627-5
Berankis R.
Naw H.
6-47-64
Gea A.
Faurel T.
6-36-0
Landaluce M.
Tabur C.[2]
7-56-2