Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Pedro Sakamoto — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Quarter-final

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG1
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#42ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA6
Pedro Sakamoto
#496ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Cerundolo J.
6-4 6-3
Sakamoto P.
Cerundolo J.
662
Sakamoto P.
430

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-4 6-3 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #42, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Sakamoto P.
19
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (182 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
13
Break points saved·Dominant
82
48
Break points won·Dominant
80
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Sakamoto P.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.8+495 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Clay Elo 1266
9.8Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1281
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.8
Surface form
2.8
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·Slight edge
97
92

Cerundolo J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sakamoto P.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3