Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alvaro Guillen Meza — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Final

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG1
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#42ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
clay
ECU5
Alvaro Guillen Meza
#276ATP
1442ELO
1412Clay ELO
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Cerundolo J.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Guillen Meza A.
Cerundolo J.
3662
Guillen Meza A.
6141

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Alvaro Guillen Meza 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #42, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Guillen Meza A.

Guillen Meza A.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Guillen Meza A.
19
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Guillen Meza A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (182 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Guillen Meza A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
19
Break points saved·Dominant
82
43
Break points won·Dominant
80
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Guillen Meza A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+350 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1412
7.4Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1442
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
2.8
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.8
Minutes 14d
7.7
0.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Guillen Meza A.
Freshness·Slight edge
97
90

Cerundolo J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Guillen Meza A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3