Hernan Casanova vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 32

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#409ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#236ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Casanova H.
6-2 6-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Casanova H.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
220

Hernan Casanova defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-2 6-2 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva came in ranked #236, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Casanova H.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
75%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.5
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
12
Break points saved·Dominant
24
49
Break points won·Clear edge
22
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Casanova H.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1381
Surface ELO
6.0+89 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1486
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
4.5
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.8
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·Dominant
60
100

Casanova H.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 91 games (7d) · Reis Da Silva J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3