Li Tu vs Hamish Stewart — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
AUS2
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1516Grass ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
GBR
Hamish Stewart
#332ATP
1513ELO
1484Grass ELO
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Tu L.
6-1 7-6
Stewart H.
Tu L.
6782
Stewart H.
1660

Li Tu defeated Hamish Stewart 6-1 7-6 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Stewart H.

Stewart H.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Stewart H.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Stewart H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+32 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Grass Elo 1484
5.5Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1513
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Stewart H.
Freshness·
—
78

Stewart H.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2