Greet Minnen vs Donna Vekic — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
Greet Minnen
BELQ
Greet Minnen
#205WTA
1723ELO
1678Grass ELO
28 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Donna Vekic
CRO7
Donna Vekic
#34WTA
1807ELO
1729Grass ELO
$625kYTD
$11MCAREER
30 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWL
Minnen G.
6-1 0-6 7-5
Vekic D.
Minnen G.
6072
Vekic D.
1651

Greet Minnen defeated Donna Vekic 6-1 0-6 7-5 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Donna Vekic came in ranked #34, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Greet Minnen claimed a first win over Donna Vekic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Greet Minnen came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 0–6 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-26US OpenR64hardDonna Vekic7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Minnen G.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Vekic D.

Vekic D.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Minnen G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Minnen G.Vekic D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (129 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Minnen G.Vekic D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
78
67
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
86
Break points won·Even
90
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Minnen G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Vekic D.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.6Grass Elo 1678
Surface ELO
5.4+50 Grass Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1723
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1807
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
6.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Minnen G.Vekic D.
Freshness·Dominant
62
95

Minnen G.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 69 games (7d) · Vekic D.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Samsonova L.[2]
Andreescu B.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Andreescu B.
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Alexandrova E.[1]
6-36-716-1
Quarter-finals
Galfi D.
Krunic A.
7-56-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Montgomery R.
6-46-3
Samsonova L.[2]
Minnen G.
6-47-5
Andreescu B.
Osaka N.
6-43-67-63
R16
Samsonova L.[2]
Naef C.
7-56-2
Galfi D.
Kudermetova V.[5]
6-33-67-5
Andreescu B.
Yuan Y.[4]
6-46-4
Osaka N.
Lamens S.
6-26-2
Krunic A.
Pegula J.[1]
7-636-736-4
Montgomery R.
Niemeier J.
6-36-3
Minnen G.
Vekic D.[7]
6-10-67-5
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bektas E.
7-56-4
R32
Osaka N.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-4
Vekic D.[7]
Korpatsch T.
6-16-3
Minnen G.
Masarova R.
6-26-4
Samsonova L.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-16-3
Andreescu B.
Vedder E.
4-66-36-2
Kudermetova V.[5]
Bai Z.
7-56-1
Montgomery R.
Linette M.[8]
6-746-37-5
Krunic A.
Ponchet J.
4-66-26-1
Naef C.
Mandlik E.
7-641-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Rus A.
6-06-3
Bektas E.
Blinkova A.
6-46-0
Lamens S.
Pera B.
4-66-26-4
Yuan Y.[4]
Shnaider D.
1-66-46-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Rodionova A.
6-36-4
Niemeier J.
Tauson C.[2]
6-46-736-4