Celine Naef vs Elizabeth Mandlik — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
SUI
Celine Naef
#194WTA
1671ELO
1632Grass ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Elizabeth Mandlik
USA
Elizabeth Mandlik
#165WTA
1530ELO
1515Grass ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Naef C.
7-6 1-6 6-4
Mandlik E.
Naef C.
77162
Mandlik E.
64641

Celine Naef defeated Elizabeth Mandlik 7-6 1-6 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Celine Naef closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mandlik E.

Mandlik E.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Mandlik E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
49%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Naef C.Mandlik E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
29
Break points saved·Dominant
81
11
Break points won·Slight edge
87
95
Deciding sets·Even
73
71
Tiebreaks·
—
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Mandlik E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+116 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Grass Elo 1515
6.5Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1530
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Mandlik E.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Naef C.: 18 days rest · Mandlik E.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Samsonova L.[2]
Andreescu B.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Andreescu B.
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Alexandrova E.[1]
6-36-716-1
Quarter-finals
Galfi D.
Krunic A.
7-56-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Montgomery R.
6-46-3
Samsonova L.[2]
Minnen G.
6-47-5
Andreescu B.
Osaka N.
6-43-67-63
R16
Samsonova L.[2]
Naef C.
7-56-2
Galfi D.
Kudermetova V.[5]
6-33-67-5
Andreescu B.
Yuan Y.[4]
6-46-4
Osaka N.
Lamens S.
6-26-2
Krunic A.
Pegula J.[1]
7-636-736-4
Montgomery R.
Niemeier J.
6-36-3
Minnen G.
Vekic D.[7]
6-10-67-5
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bektas E.
7-56-4
R32
Osaka N.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-4
Vekic D.[7]
Korpatsch T.
6-16-3
Minnen G.
Masarova R.
6-26-4
Samsonova L.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-16-3
Andreescu B.
Vedder E.
4-66-36-2
Kudermetova V.[5]
Bai Z.
7-56-1
Montgomery R.
Linette M.[8]
6-746-37-5
Krunic A.
Ponchet J.
4-66-26-1
Naef C.
Mandlik E.
7-641-66-4
Pegula J.[1]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Rus A.
6-06-3
Bektas E.
Blinkova A.
6-46-0
Lamens S.
Pera B.
4-66-26-4
Yuan Y.[4]
Shnaider D.
1-66-46-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Rodionova A.
6-36-4
Niemeier J.
Tauson C.[2]
6-46-736-4