Ashlyn Krueger vs Yafan Wang — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Ashlyn Krueger
#66WTA
1791ELO
1717Grass ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
CHN
Yafan Wang
#358WTA
1704ELO
1540Grass ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
Krueger A.
6-3 6-3
Wang Y.
Krueger A.
662
Wang Y.
330

Ashlyn Krueger defeated Yafan Wang 6-3 6-3 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Ashlyn Krueger came in ranked #66, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ashlyn Krueger extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-09-25BeijingR128hardAshlyn Krueger3-6 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger A.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Wang Y.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger A.Wang Y.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (129 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger A.Wang Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
76
Break points won·Clear edge
85
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Wang Y.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.5+177 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Grass Elo 1540
5.3Overall Elo 1791
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1704
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger A.Wang Y.
Freshness·
90
—

Krueger A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3