Francesca Jones vs Ashlyn Krueger — Nottingham Round of 16

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 16
Francesca Jones
GBRWC
Francesca Jones
#123WTA
1619ELO
1438Grass ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
USA
Ashlyn Krueger
#66WTA
1791ELO
1717Grass ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Jones F.
6-4 4-6 7-5
Krueger A.
Jones F.
6472
Krueger A.
4651

Francesca Jones defeated Ashlyn Krueger 6-4 4-6 7-5 in the Nottingham round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Ashlyn Krueger came in ranked #66.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jones F.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Krueger A.

Krueger A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jones F.

Serve advantage — Jones F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jones F.Krueger A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 129). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jones F.Krueger A.
Clutch Rating·Even
78
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
87
Break points won·Slight edge
96
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jones F.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Krueger A.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.8Grass Elo 1438
Surface ELO
6.2+279 Grass Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1619
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1791
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jones F.Krueger A.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
90

Jones F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 69 games (7d) · Krueger A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3