Ons Jabeur vs Camila Osorio — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 32
TUN1
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#53WTA
1807ELO
1619Grass ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Jabeur O.
6-2 6-3
Osorio C.
Jabeur O.
662
Osorio C.
230

Ons Jabeur defeated Camila Osorio 6-2 6-3 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Ons Jabeur came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

Head to head

4–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-01-13Australian OpenR64hardOns Jabeur7-5 6-3
2024-05-27Roland GarrosR64clayOns Jabeur6-3 1-6 6-3
2023-08-28US OpenR128hardOns Jabeur7-5 7-6(4)
2021-08-30US OpenR64hardOns Jabeur6-0 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Osorio C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Osorio C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Osorio C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
90
84
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
73
Break points won·Even
96
99
Deciding sets·Even
95
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Osorio C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
2.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Osorio C.
Freshness·
—
95

Osorio C.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3