Igor Gimenez vs Franco Ribero — Lima CH Qualifying Round 2

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
BRA9
Igor Gimenez
#627ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
clay
ARG
Franco Ribero
#700ATP
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Gimenez I.
2-6 6-0 6-3
Ribero F.
Gimenez I.
2662
Ribero F.
6031

Igor Gimenez defeated Franco Ribero 2-6 6-0 6-3 in the Lima CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimenez I.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ribero F.

Ribero F.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Gimenez I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gimenez I.Ribero F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gimenez I.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ribero F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gimenez I.Ribero F.
Freshness·
—
90

Ribero F.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sell K.[1]
Stater A.
6-06-4
Adams H.[2]
Vilicich B.
7-56-3
Hudd E.[11]
Justo G.[3]
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Aboian L.[4]
6-36-2
Gimenez I.[9]
Ribero F.
2-66-06-3
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Leite W.[7]
6-46-3
Q1
Stater A.
Blanch D.[8]
6-37-63
Vilicich B.
Gomez J.[12]
6-03-66-3
Sell K.[1]
Gomez E.
6-26-3
Adams H.[2]
Watanabe S.
6-36-2
Hudd E.[11]
Lobanov A.
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Hilderbrand T.
6-45-76-3
Ribero F.
Farjat T.[5]
3-66-26-3
Gimenez I.[9]
Li C.
2-66-06-1
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Botran Neutze R.
6-06-1
Leite W.[7]
Alvarado Berrospi A.
6-36-1