Magdalena Frech vs Tatjana Maria — Nottingham Round of 16

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 16
Magdalena Frech
POL5
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1555Grass ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Tatjana Maria
GER
Tatjana Maria
#76WTA
1703ELO
1688Grass ELO
38 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Frech M.
3-6 6-3 6-1
Maria T.
Frech M.
3662
Maria T.
6311

Magdalena Frech defeated Tatjana Maria 3-6 6-3 6-1 in the Nottingham round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Magdalena Frech came in ranked #44, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Frech M.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Maria T.

Maria T.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Frech M.Maria T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
50%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 133). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Frech M.Maria T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
13
Break points saved·Dominant
76
31
Break points won·Slight edge
71
78
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Frech M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Maria T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Grass Elo 1555
Surface ELO
5.6+133 Grass Elo edge
6.5Overall Elo 1725
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1703
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
0.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Frech M.Maria T.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Frech M.: 15 days rest · Maria T.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 81 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3