Magdalena Frech vs Nao Hibino — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 32
Magdalena Frech
POL5
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1555Grass ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#235WTA
1560ELO
1479Grass ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLWW
Frech M.
6-1 6-4
Hibino N.
Frech M.
662
Hibino N.
140

Magdalena Frech defeated Nao Hibino 6-1 6-4 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Magdalena Frech came in ranked #44, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Frech M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Hibino N.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Frech M.Hibino N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Frech M.Hibino N.
Clutch Rating·Even
55
53
Break points saved·Dominant
76
39
Break points won·Clear edge
71
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
72
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Frech M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Hibino N.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.7+76 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Grass Elo 1479
7.5Overall Elo 1725
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1560
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
1.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Frech M.Hibino N.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
91

Frech M.: 15 days rest · Hibino N.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Pliskova K.[6]
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Pliskova K.[6]
Parry D.
6-796-16-4
Boulter K.
Raducanu E.
6-7136-36-4
Quarter-finals
Raducanu E.
Jones F.
W/O
Pliskova K.[6]
Jabeur O.[1]
7-686-737-5
Boulter K.
Frech M.[5]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Birrell K.
6-37-64
R16
Jones F.
Krueger A.
6-44-67-5
Birrell K.
Stefanini L.
6-46-756-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[6]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Frech M.[5]
Maria T.
3-66-36-1
Raducanu E.
Snigur D.
6-26-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-46-3
Parry D.
Saville D.
6-46-1
R32
Snigur D.
Kostyuk M.[2]
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Miyazaki Y.
6-47-5
Watson H.
Day K.
4-66-06-4
Stefanini L.
Zhu L.[7]
7-643-67-5
Frech M.[5]
Hibino N.
6-16-4
Marino R.
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-756-47-5
Jones F.
Dolehide C.[8]
7-636-3
Raducanu E.
Shibahara E.
6-16-4
Maria T.
Arango E.
4-67-677-66
Parry D.
Bucsa C.
6-36-2
Saville D.
Burel C.[4]
6-36-3
Pliskova K.[6]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Birrell K.
Appleton E.
6-37-5
Krueger A.
Wang Y.
6-36-3