Jacob Fearnley vs Mark Lajal — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 2

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GBR
Jacob Fearnley
#123ATP
1600ELO
1546Grass ELO
$342kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
EST3
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1546Grass ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Fearnley J.
6-2 6-4
Lajal M.
Fearnley J.
662
Lajal M.
240

Jacob Fearnley defeated Mark Lajal 6-2 6-4 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 2 on grass. The result followed the form book — Jacob Fearnley came in ranked #123.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fearnley J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Fearnley J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fearnley J.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fearnley J.Lajal M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
89
Break points won·Dominant
70
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
42
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fearnley J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 609 days (−1.5)
Lajal M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.1+0 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Grass Elo 1546
5.6Overall Elo 1600
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1589
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fearnley J.Lajal M.
Freshness·Dominant
42
88

Fearnley J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d) · Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2