Franco Ribero vs Tomas Farjat — Lima CH Qualifying Round 1

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ARG
Franco Ribero
#700ATP
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
clay
ARG5
Tomas Farjat
#754ATP
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Ribero F.
3-6 6-2 6-3
Farjat T.
Ribero F.
3662
Farjat T.
6231

Franco Ribero defeated Tomas Farjat 3-6 6-2 6-3 in the Lima CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ribero F.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Farjat T.

Farjat T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ribero F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ribero F.Farjat T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
41%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
7.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (49 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ribero F.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Farjat T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.0
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ribero F.Farjat T.
Freshness·
90
—

Ribero F.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sell K.[1]
Stater A.
6-06-4
Adams H.[2]
Vilicich B.
7-56-3
Hudd E.[11]
Justo G.[3]
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Aboian L.[4]
6-36-2
Gimenez I.[9]
Ribero F.
2-66-06-3
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Leite W.[7]
6-46-3
Q1
Stater A.
Blanch D.[8]
6-37-63
Vilicich B.
Gomez J.[12]
6-03-66-3
Sell K.[1]
Gomez E.
6-26-3
Adams H.[2]
Watanabe S.
6-36-2
Hudd E.[11]
Lobanov A.
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Hilderbrand T.
6-45-76-3
Ribero F.
Farjat T.[5]
3-66-26-3
Gimenez I.[9]
Li C.
2-66-06-1
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Botran Neutze R.
6-06-1
Leite W.[7]
Alvarado Berrospi A.
6-36-1