Jacob Fearnley vs Clement Chidekh — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
GBR
Jacob Fearnley
#123ATP
1600ELO
1546Grass ELO
$342kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
FRA8
Clement Chidekh
#207ATP
1513ELO
1412Grass ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
Fearnley J.
2-6 6-3 7-6
Chidekh C.
Fearnley J.
26772
Chidekh C.
63641

Jacob Fearnley defeated Clement Chidekh 2-6 6-3 7-6 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass. The result followed the form book — Jacob Fearnley came in ranked #123.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fearnley J.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Chidekh C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fearnley J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fearnley J.Chidekh C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fearnley J.Chidekh C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
83
Break points won·Dominant
70
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fearnley J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 609 days (−1.5)
Chidekh C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.1+134 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Grass Elo 1412
5.5Overall Elo 1600
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1513
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fearnley J.Chidekh C.
Freshness·Clear edge
42
66

Fearnley J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d) · Chidekh C.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2