Charles Broom vs Blake Ellis — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 2

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GBR9
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1386Grass ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1408Grass ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Broom C.
6-4 6-4
Ellis B.
Broom C.
662
Ellis B.
440

Charles Broom defeated Blake Ellis 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 2 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Charles Broom edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
79
Break points won·Even
0
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ellis B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.9Grass Elo 1386
Surface ELO
5.1+22 Grass Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Ellis B.
Freshness·
—
90

Ellis B.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2