Mark Lajal vs Patrick Brady — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
EST3
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1546Grass ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
GBR
Patrick Brady
#838ATP
21 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWW
Lajal M.
6-3 3-6 6-0
Brady P.
Lajal M.
6362
Brady P.
3601

Mark Lajal defeated Patrick Brady 6-3 3-6 6-0 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Brady P.

Brady P.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Serve advantage — Lajal M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Brady P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Brady P.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 133 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Brady P.
Freshness·Even
88
85

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Brady P.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2