Alex De Minaur vs Zizou Bergs — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 16
Alex De Minaur
AUS2
Alex De Minaur
#5ATP
1961ELO
1834Grass ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
grass
Zizou Bergs
BEL8
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1712Grass ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
De Minaur A.
7-5 6-4
Bergs Z.
De Minaur A.
762
Bergs Z.
540

Alex De Minaur defeated Zizou Bergs 7-5 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #5, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Alex De Minaur extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-13Davis Cup QLS R2: AUS vs BELRRhardAlex De Minaur6-2 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
69
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Dominant
97
21
Deciding sets·Slight edge
97
92
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Bergs Z.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.0+122 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Grass Elo 1712
7.3Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1808
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
0.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Even
80
79

De Minaur A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d) · Bergs Z.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
De Minaur A.[2]
Korda S.[7]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Korda S.[7]
Griekspoor T.[6]
6-26-4
De Minaur A.[2]
Humbert U.[5]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[7]
Paul T.[2]
6-46-2
Humbert U.[5]
Brouwer G.
4-66-36-3
Griekspoor T.[6]
Vukic A.
4-66-37-64
De Minaur A.[2]
Raonic M.
7-56-2
R16
Humbert U.[5]
Fils A.
6-37-61
Raonic M.
Bautista Agut R.
4-66-27-5
Vukic A.
Khachanov K.[4]
6-45-77-64
De Minaur A.[2]
Bergs Z.[8]
7-56-4
Paul T.[2]
Popyrin A.
5-76-46-3
Korda S.[7]
Nardi L.
7-57-5
Griekspoor T.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-37-65
Brouwer G.
Mannarino A.
6-36-3
R32
Griekspoor T.[6]
Kecmanovic M.
6-737-677-63
Brouwer G.
Mensik J.
6-13-66-3
Nardi L.
Goffin D.
7-57-5
Vukic A.
Purcell M.
6-37-65
Mcdonald M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-44-66-2
Raonic M.
Thompson J.[8]
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Napolitano S.
3-67-656-2
Popyrin A.
Hijikata R.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.[8]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-3
Korda S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-47-64
Fils A.
Cazaux A.
6-46-4
Bautista Agut R.
Huesler M.
7-676-2